Nutritional balance of no-added-sugar chocolates - 2011

[PEREZGONZALEZ Jose D (2011). Nutritional balance of no-added-sugar chocolates. Journal of Knowledge Advancement & Integration (ISSN 1177-4576), 2011, pages 43-45.] [Printer friendly]

Nutritional balance of no-added-sugar chocolates

The nutritional balance of sugar-free chocolates was studied by Pérezgonzález in 20111. He found that a sample of chocolate bars, chocolate blocks and bonbons currently available in New Zealand shared a similar nutritional profile characterized as being low in protein, high in fat, high in saturated fat, low in fiber and low in sodium (Pérezgonzález, 2011b2). Sugar-free chocolates, however, differed from other chocolates in also being adequate (or low) in sugar and, consequently, low in carbohydrate4 (see profile in Illustration 2).

On average, no-added-sugar chocolates have a nutritional balance of BNI 82.73f, being particularly unbalanced towards excess of fat.

Illustration 1: Nutrition information (no-added-sugar chocolates)
BNI 82.73f 0.00
Food, 100g 2011 Ideal
Protein 5.9 27.9
Carbohydrate 51.1 76.6
Sugars 3.3 < 13.9
Fat 36.6 15.5
Saturated fat 23.8 < 6.2
Fiber 1.0 8.4
Sodium 0.028 < 0.557
Kcal 557.4 557.4
kJul 2332.2 2332.2
Illustration 2: Nutritional profile (no-added-sugar)
60% *
55% *
50% *
45% *
40% *
35% * *
30% * *
25% * *
20% * *
15% * *
10% * *
5% * * * *
mid p c f fb
max s sf na
5% *
10% *
15% *
20% *
25% *
30% *
35% *
40% *
ideal % = grey cells; actual % = asterisk (*)

International standards

No-added-sugar chocolates show small changes in their indexing across different international Recommended Dietary Intakes (RDIs) (see illustration 3). Overall, however, all nutritional indexes are high and relatively similar to each other, which indicates that the nutritional composition of no-added-sugar chocolates would be deemed highly unbalanced in different countries. Notwithstanding this, such nutritional unbalance is sensibly smaller than that of typical chocolates and sugary chocolates.

Illustration 3: Nutritional balance across different RDIs (no-added-sugar chocolates)
No-sugar-added chocolates average 82.73 82.73 81.39 81.39 79.39
Product100g Company BNI WHO US/CAN AUS/NZ UK
Guylian No Sugar Added milk Guylian 79.46 79.46 74.86 74.86 72.86
Guylian No Sugar Added dark Guylian 85.68 85.68 80.21 80.21 78.21
Richfields No Added Sugar classic dark Richfields 89.25 89.25 89.25 89.25 87.25

Correlations between indexes are also very high (although, given that there are only 3 chocolates in this subsample, only perfect correlations were statistically significant). Nonetheless, the pattern of correlations suggests that the nutritional balance reported by the BNI™ index matches that of other nutritional standards. (Said otherwise, that no-sugar-added chocolates tend to form a similar hierarchy when indexed using different international standards).

Illustration 4: Correlations between RDIs
BNI WHO US/CAN AUS/NZ
WHO 1.000
(sig.) .000
US/CAN .955 .955
(sig.) .192 .192
AUS/NZ .955 .955 1.000
(sig.) .192 .192 .000
UK .955 .955 1.000 1.000
(sig.) .192 .192 .000 .000

Author

Jose D PEREZGONZALEZ (2011). Massey University, Turitea Campus, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. (JDPerezgonzalezJDPerezgonzalez).


Other interesting sites
320
Journal KAI
105px-Stylised_Lithium_Atom.png
Wiki of Science
120px-Aileron_roll.gif
AviationKnowledge
Artwork-194-web.jpg
A4art
Artwork-162-web.jpg
The Balanced Nutrition Index
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License