[PEREZGONZALEZ Jose D (2008). Nutritional balance of flavored low-fat soymilk. Journal of Knowledge Advancement & Integration (ISSN 1177-4576), 2011, pages 84-86.] [Printer friendly]
Nutritional balance of flavored low-fat soymilk
This article offers descriptive data regarding the nutritional balance of flavored low-fat soymilk. These data were collected for a research on milk and milk alternatives in New Zealand between 2007 and 2008 (Perezgonzalez, 20081).
Flavored low-fat soymilk is an illustrative example of the "unbalancing" effects of added sugar to an otherwise closer to nutritional balance low-fat soymilk. Indeed, the average flavored low-fat soymilk (in this sample) turns out to be adequate in protein, carbohydrate and fat, low in saturated fat, low in fiber, high in sodium, and extremely high in sugar.
On average, flavored low-fat soymilk has a nutritional balance of BNI 79.18s, being particularly unbalanced towards excess of sugar.
|
|
International standards
Flavored low-fat soymilk appears as unbalanced according to international Recommended Dietary Intakes (RDIs), although less so according to U.S. and Canada's standards, which allow for a higher content of sugars.
Illustration 3: Nutritional balance across different RDIs (flavored low-fat soymilk) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flavored soymilk | average | 79.18 | 94.07 | 48.70 | 78.78 | 75.64 | |
Product 100ml | Company | BNI | WHO | US/CAN | AUS/NZ | UK | |
Vitasoy lush chocolate | Vitasoy | 78.87 | 92.43 | 48.31 | 78.31 | 76.31 | |
Vitasoy lush caramel | Vitasoy | 80.00 | 96.97 | 49.41 | 79.41 | 77.41 | |
(Source: Perezgonzalez, 20081) |
Author
Jose D PEREZGONZALEZ (2011). Massey University, Turitea Campus, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. (JDPerezgonzalez).
Other interesting sites |
Journal KAI |
Wiki of Science |
AviationKnowledge |
A4art |
The Balanced Nutrition Index |